<?xml 
version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
>

<channel xml:lang="fr">

	<title>Open source impeded by incompatibilities and inconsistencies in the Office Open XML document format - commentaires</title>
	<link>http://clx.asso.fr/spip/?Open-source-impeded-by-incompatibilities-and-inconsistencies-in-the-Office-Open</link>
	<description>
Open source impeded by incompatibilities and inconsistencies in the Office Open XML document format &#9659;https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/elibrary/case/complex-singularity-versus-openness When it comes to office documents, public administrations can choose from two ISO/IEC standards. Only one of these, ODF (ISO/IEC 26300), is vendor-neutral, open and reliable across a span of years and software versions, and supported by a variety of software products. The later OOXML standard (ISO/IEC 29500), (&#8230;)
</description>
	<language>fr</language>
    <generator>SPIP - www.spip.net</generator>

	






</channel>

</rss>
