<?xml 
version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
>

<channel xml:lang="fr">

	<title>Certificate revocation : Why browsers remain affected by Heartbleed | Netcraft - commentaires</title>
	<link>http://clx.asso.fr/spip/?Certificate-revocation-Why-browsers-remain-affected-by-Heartbleed-Netcraft</link>
	<description>
Certificate revocation : Why browsers remain affected by Heartbleed | Netcraft &#9659;http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2014/04/24/certificate-revocation-why-browsers-remain-affected-by-heartbleed.htm More than 80,000 SSL certificates were revoked in the week following the publication of the Heartbleed bug, but the certificate revocation mechanisms used by major browsers could still leave Internet users vulnerable to impersonation attacks. Little has changed since Netcraft last reported on (&#8230;)
</description>
	<language>fr</language>
    <generator>SPIP - www.spip.net</generator>

	






</channel>

</rss>
